Sunflower II
Sunflower II
Signed Print
David Hockney
£7,500-£11,500 VALUE (EST.)
$14,500-$22,000 VALUE (EST.)
$12,500-$19,000 VALUE (EST.)
¥70,000-¥100,000 VALUE (EST.)
€8,500-€13,000 VALUE (EST.)
$70,000-$110,000 VALUE (EST.)
¥1,360,000-¥2,090,000 VALUE (EST.)
$9,000-$14,000 VALUE (EST.)
This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren’t enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Intaglio, 1995
Signed Print Edition of 80
H 46cm x W 38cm
TradingFloor
Your collection tracked in realtime.
Build your portfolio, manage valuations, view return against your collection and watch works you’re looking for.
Track value trend
Auction Results
| Auction Date | Auction House | Artwork | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2022 | Phillips New York - United States | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| April 2022 | Phillips New York - United States | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| July 2021 | Forum Auctions London - United Kingdom | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| January 2021 | Phillips London - United Kingdom | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| June 2020 | Phi Auctions - United States | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| March 2018 | Bonhams Knightsbridge - United Kingdom | Sunflower II - Signed Print | |||
| March 2015 | Sotheby's Online - United Kingdom | Sunflower II - Signed Print |
Meaning & Analysis
Seemingly identical to Sunflower I by David Hockney, Sunflower II shows a still life of sunflowers in a pot against a plain background. Here however the black ink appears a little lighter and the image becomes charcoal soft, and yet retains much of the dynamism of the original. As well as a study from life of a subject – flowers – that Hockney loved and returned to throughout his career, the work can also be read as an homage to Dutch master Vincent van Gogh who Hockney had admired since he was young. Throughout his oeuvre Hockney constantly references artists who went before him – such as Picasso and Hogarth – but van Gogh stands out as an inspiration perhaps because Hockney compared his move to LA from london in 1964 to ‘van Gogh going to Arles’. In this way the work acts as a tribute to both the natural and fleeting beauty of flowers as well as the lessons learned by looking at still lifes by other artists which helped shape his eye for detail, space and light. These years of study reach their culmination in the 90s when this work was made, and continues today with Hockney’s prolific production of studies of flowers both in their natural habitats and in still lifes, on his iPad.
