£26,000-£40,000
$50,000-$80,000 Value Indicator
$45,000-$70,000 Value Indicator
¥240,000-¥370,000 Value Indicator
€30,000-€50,000 Value Indicator
$260,000-$400,000 Value Indicator
¥4,970,000-¥7,640,000 Value Indicator
$35,000-$50,000 Value Indicator
AAGR (5 years) This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren't enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Medium: Screenprint
Edition size: 250
Year: 1972
Size: H 89cm x W 89cm
Signed: Yes
Format: Signed Print
TradingFloor
Watch artwork, manage valuations, track your portfolio and return against your collection
Auction Date | Auction House | Artwork | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2024 | Phillips London - United Kingdom | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
May 2023 | SBI Art Auction - Japan | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
March 2023 | Sotheby's Online - United Kingdom | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
September 2022 | Christie's London - United Kingdom | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
April 2022 | Doyle Auctioneers & Appraisers - United States | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
March 2022 | Christie's New York - United States | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print | |||
November 2021 | Palm Beach Modern Auctions - United States | Mao (F. & S. II.94) - Signed Print |
Taken from his renowned Mao series from 1972, Mao (F. & S. II.94) is a print by Andy Warhol that features a striking portrait of the Chinese communist leader Chairman Mao Zedong. The print contrasts orange hues in Mao’s face and green tunic against a pink background. The colours seep into his eyes and Warhol has deliberately created imperfections with the ink.
Warhol’s use of colour in this Mao print works within the aesthetic of Western kitsch and alludes to the appearance of makeup on Mao’s face. Light pink is added to enhance the lips of the statesman and his darkly coloured mole is reminiscent of Marylin Monroe’s beauty mark. In the suggestion of makeup and use of fluorescent colours, Warhol makes a statement on the false veneer that the original propaganda image attempts to portray and at the same time revitalises Chairman Mao as an unlikely Pop icon to be distributed as an image in the mass-media.
Relying on his typical method of screen printing with the aim of mass-production, Warhol reflects the wide distribution of Mao’s image in communist China whilst also comparing this to the obsessive production of mass-media images in capitalist America. The result is a humorous social commentary on these opposing systems of power during the political tensions of the Cold War.