Anatomy, Anterior View
Anatomy, Anterior View
Signed Print
Jean-Michel Basquiat
£11,000-£16,000Value
Indicator
$21,000-$30,000 Value Indicator
$19,000-$27,000 Value Indicator
¥100,000-¥150,000 Value Indicator
€13,000-€19,000 Value Indicator
$110,000-$160,000 Value Indicator
¥2,050,000-¥2,980,000 Value Indicator
$14,000-$20,000 Value Indicator
This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren’t enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Screen print, 1982, on Arches 88. Signed and numbered in an edition of 18. S. 76.5 x 56.5 cm (30 1/8 x 22¼ in.).
TradingFloor
MyPortfolio
Your colletion tracked in realtime.
Build your portfolio, manage valuations, view return against your collection and watch works you're looking for.
Track value trend
Auction Results
| Auction Date | Auction House | Artwork | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2014 | Sotheby's New York - United States | Anatomy, Anterior View - Signed Print | |||
| April 2009 | Christie's New York - United States | Anatomy, Anterior View - Signed Print |
Meaning & Analysis
Anterior View is a drawing of the anatomy of an arm depicted from behind. We can see labels for the scapula, humerus, head of the radius, trochlea, radius and phalanges. The clinical character and compositional sparseness of the print clashes with the popular vision of Jean-Michel Basquiat’s riotous and colourful graffiti-like images. The childlike rendering of the body parts underlines the artist’s attestation that “I want to make paintings that look as if they were made by a child”.
The lines used to indicate different bones, whilst emblematic of the drawings’ diagrammatic quality, echoes the extensive use of arrows and abstract lines in the artist’s body of work, such as in Ascent.
Even though Basquiat labels each body part which he draws in this x-ray-like image, there are traces of omissions and erroneous strokes, with an ‘a’ being omitted from ‘phalanges’ and an errant line beside the ‘radius’ annotation. This is the merest suggestion of the lexical experimentation and textual rupture which features heavily in Basquiat’s canvases.
